A message from our friends at The Oxford Club (sponsor)
Dear Reader,
Dr. Mark Skousen here...
I'm making the boldest prediction of my 45-year career.
It all centers around one date: March 26, 2026.
That's when I believe Elon Musk will announce the SpaceX IPO... in what Bloomberg is already calling "the biggest listing of ALL TIME."
The SpaceX IPO is anticipated to bring a $1.5 TRILLION valuation.
That would be 3,000 times bigger than Amazon's IPO.
But here's the thing...
Most investors will be locked out.
They'll have to wait until AFTER the IPO to get in.
By then, the biggest gains will be gone.
But I've lined up something special just for my readers...
I've found a backdoor that lets you grab a pre-IPO stake in SpaceX... BEFORE Elon steps up to that podium!
And I'm giving away the ticker for free.
Yours for peace, prosperity, and liberty, AEIOU,
Dr. Mark Skousen
Macroeconomic Strategist, The Oxford Club
P.S. Studies suggest 95% of profits are made BEFORE a company goes public. March 26th is coming fast. Click here to learn how to get positioned now.
BONUS ARTICLE
BTC Holds $68K — Watch MARA and IREN
Why This Moment Matters for Active Traders
Bitcoin miners don’t trade like normal equities when the network is under stress. They trade like a three-variable derivative:
Bitcoin price (BTC)
Network difficulty / hashrate (competition level)
Hashprice (revenue per unit of compute), which compresses fast when difficulty rises faster than BTC
Right now, those variables are not aligned.
BTC is around $67,985.
Mining difficulty just surged to about 144.4T (roughly a ~15% jump) as hashrate rebounded.
Hashrate is reported as recovering toward ~1 ZH/s (1,000 EH/s).
And “hashprice” has been cited around ~$23.9 per PH/s (multi-year low territory), which is the pressure point for miners’ margin math.
That combination creates the classic miner tape: violent rallies on BTC up-moves, fast drawdowns when difficulty squeezes margins, and wide dispersion between operators with strong power economics and those that are forced sellers.
This is precisely where active traders should stop thinking in narratives (“miners are cheap”) and start trading a regime.
While few analysts consistently identify promising memecoin opportunities, our dedicated team has crafted a reliable framework that enables them to spot high-momentum plays early. They've now discovered a groundbreaking project exhibiting similar traits, and they invite you to explore the comprehensive analysis yourself.
Macro Context: The Data That Actually Moves Miners
1) BTC price is the headline — but not the whole driver
BTC is currently near $67,985, with an intraday range roughly $67,576–$68,637.
For miners, BTC direction matters most when the network variables are stable. When difficulty is moving quickly, BTC price alone can be an incomplete signal.
2) Difficulty just reset higher — competition intensified
A difficulty move to roughly 144.4T is not a rounding error.
Higher difficulty means each unit of hashrate earns a smaller share of the block reward, all else equal. In trader terms: operating leverage turns against you unless BTC rises enough to offset it.
3) Hashrate recovering toward ~1 ZH/s changes the miner “supply” curve
The hashrate recovery toward ~1 ZH/s suggests miners came back online aggressively after disruptions/curtailments.
That’s structurally bearish for miner margins unless BTC price is rising faster than hashrate and difficulty.
4) Hashprice is the “P&L thermometer”
Hashprice around ~$23.9/PH/s implies a tighter revenue environment.
When hashprice compresses:
high-cost miners become forced sellers sooner,
the strongest power operators gain relative advantage,
equities become more sensitive to capital structure and treasury strategy.
Active trader implication: during hashprice compression, you trade miners more like credit + volatility instruments than “growth stocks.”
Sector Breakdown: Miners Are a BTC Beta Stack (Not One Trade)
The public miner universe can be segmented into two buckets that matter for trading:
Bucket A: “Scale + Treasury” miners (BTC holdings + hashrate scale)
These names can behave like:
a leveraged BTC proxy (up beta),
with optionality from BTC treasury,
but downside risk if BTC drops while difficulty rises.
MARA is the clean example here, given the scale and the corporate narrative around capacity and BTC holdings.
Bucket B: “Infrastructure + Power + Optionality” miners (power secured, multi-business pivots)
These names trade with:
BTC beta,
but also exposure to power/data-center infrastructure and alternative compute pivots.
IREN increasingly sits in this category given its communications around power, funding, and AI-related initiatives alongside mining results.
The right playbook is not “pick one.” It’s to know which bucket is leading as the macro variables change.
Do you have funds deposited with any of these institutions? Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, or U.S. Bancorp? If so... Act now! These banks are on the brink of what could be the most significant transformation in our financial system in 54 years.
Stock-Level Analysis: MARA Holdings (MARA)
The tape snapshot
MARA is around $7.97, with an intraday range roughly $7.75–$8.30.
This is important: when MARA trades sub-$10, it often regains “option-like” behavior—moves can be large in % terms with modest BTC shifts.
Scale and targets: hashrate and power matter
MARA has publicly discussed:
1.7 GW of captive capacity (including 1.1 GW operational)
a growth pipeline exceeding 3 GW
a target of 75 EH/s by end of 2025
That’s the long-cycle fundamental signal: MARA is positioning to be a scale leader, and scale matters most when margins are healthy.
Treasury / holdings: the “embedded BTC optionality”
MARA reported holding 52,477 BTC as of Aug. 31, 2025, and noted it did not sell BTC that month.
This changes the equity’s reaction function:
In BTC rallies, holdings amplify upside sentiment.
In drawdowns, holdings can become a “risk asset” on the balance sheet, especially if funding needs rise.
Operational credibility: hashrate expansion and revenue
MARA’s Q3 2025 materials and related transcript coverage cite:
energized hashrate around 60.4 EH/s (and significant YoY growth)
revenue referenced around $252.4M for Q3 2025 in the shareholder letter excerpt
Trading takeaway: MARA’s fundamental story is scale + power + treasury. But the equity still trades like a function of BTC trend and network margin pressure.
Stock-Level Analysis: IREN Limited (IREN)
The tape snapshot
IREN is around $39.98, with an intraday range roughly $39.53–$44.25.
That’s a very wide day. When IREN prints that kind of range, it’s usually telling you the market is pricing both:
BTC-linked volatility, and
company-specific catalysts (earnings, guidance, financing, strategy).
Q2 FY26 results: concrete numbers that matter
IREN reported (Q2 FY26):
Total revenue: $184.7M
Bitcoin mining revenue: $167.4M
AI cloud services revenue: $17.3M
Cash and cash equivalents: $2.8B as of Jan. 31, 2026
This set of figures matters because it highlights IREN’s profile:
still predominantly mining revenue,
but increasingly positioning for adjacent compute/services,
with meaningful liquidity headline.
Operational cadence: monthly production and cost focus
IREN’s monthly update format includes operating hashrate and BTC mined; for example, an April 2025 update cites:
average operating hashrate 36.6 EH/s
BTC mined 579
“electricity cost” metrics referenced per BTC
Trading takeaway: IREN is often a higher-volatility vehicle because the market is constantly re-rating it between “pure miner” and “digital infrastructure pivot.” That can create sharp repricing around results and funding headlines.
Technical Framework: How Active Traders Should Structure This
Because miners are BTC-derivative equities, the cleanest technical approach is cross-asset confirmation rather than single-chart worship.
1) Use BTC as the signal, miners as the expression
BTC is at $67,985.
Psychological and flow levels matter more than precision in this regime. For framework purposes:
$70,000 becomes a “risk-on confirmation” area.
The $67,500–$68,000 zone is a near-term “hold-or-fail” area (given the recent intraday lows).
2) Intraday discipline: VWAP and first-hour range
Miners are notorious for:
opening-range traps,
liquidity spikes,
reversals when BTC chops.
Practical rule:
If MARA/IREN cannot hold VWAP while BTC is stable-to-up, the move is likely equity-specific supply, not BTC strength.
If MARA/IREN hold VWAP on a BTC dip, that’s relative strength worth respecting.
3) Relative strength tells you which name the market prefers
When difficulty is rising (as it is now), leadership tends to consolidate into:
stronger balance sheets,
clearer power economics,
and operators that are less likely to be forced sellers.
In that regime, the “winner” is often the one that doesn’t go down as much on BTC dips.
Scenario Modeling: Base, Bull, Bear (With Explicit Triggers)
Base Case: BTC range-trades while difficulty stays elevated
Trigger: BTC holds the upper-$60Ks but cannot sustain a clean breakout; difficulty remains around the new higher level (~144.4T).
Likely market behavior:
BTC chops.
Miners whipsaw.
Stock selection matters more than “miners as a group.”
Implications:
MARA trades as a liquid beta vehicle (fast rotations).
IREN trades with larger single-name moves around results/strategy, but remains BTC-sensitive.
Bull Case: BTC breaks higher and hashprice stabilizes
Trigger: BTC reclaims higher psychological levels (market watches round numbers like $70K) and the market sees signs that margin pressure is not worsening (hashprice stops deteriorating).
Likely market behavior:
Miners outperform BTC (classic leveraged beta phase).
The highest-beta names lead first.
Implications:
MARA can move sharply because it’s a liquid proxy with scale narrative and treasury optionality.
IREN can spike on “operational leverage + liquidity” narratives, but traders should watch if it holds gains after the first impulse move.
Bear Case: BTC slips while difficulty stays high
Trigger: BTC loses the upper-$60Ks support band while difficulty remains near the elevated zone.
This is the pain trade for miners:
revenue pressure increases,
equity dilution/funding fear reappears,
and correlations go to 1 on the downside.
Implications:
In this scenario, rallies in MARA/IREN are more likely to be sold unless BTC stabilizes quickly.
The risk is not just price—it’s “forced seller” dynamics in a compressed hashprice environment.
Active Trader Strategy: Specific, Conditional Frameworks
MARA (high liquidity, high beta proxy)
MARA at ~$7.97 is the type of price point where % moves can be outsized.
Framework
If BTC is green and pushing toward $70K and MARA holds above VWAP after the first hour → treat MARA as the “beta expression.”
If BTC is stable but MARA can’t hold VWAP → assume equity supply is present; avoid chasing.
If BTC breaks down and MARA loses the day’s low → treat bounces as tactical only until BTC stabilizes.
What to watch fundamentally (because the tape will care):
scale targets like 75 EH/s and the power footprint (1.7 GW captive capacity) as the backbone of the longer-cycle thesis.
treasury posture, given 52,477 BTC disclosed in 2025 monthly updates.
IREN (bigger single-name catalyst risk, liquidity headline)
IREN at ~$39.98 with a huge intraday range is telling you volatility is already priced.
Framework
If BTC is up and IREN holds VWAP, it can trend—especially if the market is leaning into “strong liquidity + operating scale” narratives.
If BTC is flat and IREN is still volatile, focus on company-driven catalysts: earnings revisions, financing headlines, segment performance.
Hard data to anchor expectations:
Q2 FY26 $184.7M revenue, $167.4M mining revenue, $17.3M AI cloud, and $2.8B cash—numbers that influence how the market prices survival and growth optionality.
Editorial Disclaimer
This commentary is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All market strategies involve risk, and past performance is not indicative of future results. Readers should conduct their own analysis or consult a licensed financial professional before making investment decisions.