First a message from our friends at The Oxford Club (sponsor)
Dear Reader,
I just bought 10,000 shares of a little $5 company...
I think it could be a fantastic opportunity (as I explain here.)
Similar to when I put $50k into a little-known mining company back in 1995...
Then cashed out 3 years later for about $1.3 million.
Yours for peace, prosperity, and liberty, AEIOU,
Dr. Mark Skousen
Macroeconomic Strategist, The Oxford Club
FEATURED ARTICLE
Home Improvement Earnings Week — HD and LOW Are a 4–5% Volatility Event
Earnings weeks matter most when three conditions overlap:
A known catalyst with priced volatility
A macro backdrop that can flip interpretation
Two highly comparable companies reporting back-to-back
This week checks all three.
Home Depot (HD) and Lowe’s (LOW) aren’t just reporting results—they’re reporting on the U.S. consumer’s willingness to spend on the home, at a time when housing turnover remains sluggish and affordability is only gradually improving.
Options markets are already telling you the scope of the event:
HD is priced for about a ±4% move around earnings.
LOW is priced for about a ±5% move around earnings.
That’s large enough to matter for weekly traders, but not so large that it’s random. It’s the zone where earnings interpretation and guidance nuance drive directional continuation—or a fast mean reversion if the tape decides the move was “too much.”
Your edge comes from being specific:
what the market is already pricing,
what would change the narrative,
and where price action will confirm the scenario.
Macro Context: Housing Is Not “Strong,” It’s “Stabilizing Unevenly”
Mortgage rates are improving, but not a demand unlock yet
Freddie Mac’s weekly survey shows the 30-year fixed mortgage rate at 6.01% as of Feb 19, 2026, down from 6.09% the prior week.
That’s a meaningful tailwind at the margin. But the housing data still shows constrained activity.
Existing-home sales rolled over again
January existing-home sales fell 8.4% to 3.91 million (SAAR), the lowest level since late 2023, with inventory still tight and median price around $396,800.
Translation for HD/LOW:
Fewer transactions = fewer big-ticket “new home” projects.
Tight inventory = less forced renovation cycle from moving.
Consumers still do projects, but skew toward repair/maintenance vs aspirational remodels.
Pending home sales also softened
Pending home sales fell 0.8% in January—not catastrophic, but consistent with a slow-turnover market.
Why traders care: housing turnover is one of the cleanest demand multipliers for home improvement retail. When turnover is weak, the market becomes hypersensitive to commentary about:
project deferral,
ticket size,
and the Pro pipeline.
Sector Setup: Home Improvement Retail Is a “Pro vs DIY” Story Now
Both companies have been explicit that DIY has been softer, and the fight is about:
capturing Pro wallets,
holding gross margin while demand is uneven,
and managing inventory without promotional damage.
Investors are also reading these prints as a proxy for:
consumer health,
household balance sheet behavior,
and spring project appetite (which is rate-sensitive).
This is why HD/LOW earnings often move not just the stocks—but also sentiment across housing-related equities and ETFs (e.g., homebuilders/housing complex).
For context, the housing-related ETFs are trading higher into the week:
XHB: $118.91
ITB: $110.91
That creates a simple but important tape risk:
If HD/LOW disappoint, they can pressure the whole housing complex.
If they confirm stabilization, they can reinforce a “real economy leadership” rotation.
What the Market Is Pricing: The Earnings Move Map
Home Depot (HD): priced move ~±4%
HD is at $382.25.
A ±4% earnings move implies:
4% of 382.25 = 0.04 × 382.25 = 15.29
Implied range:
Down: 382.25 − 15.29 = 366.96
Up: 382.25 + 15.29 = 397.54
That lines up with the market’s own “headline” framing of roughly $366 to $398.
Volatility context:
Barchart lists HD implied volatility around ~30.6%, vs historical volatility around ~22.7%, with IV percentile ~92%—meaning options are relatively “rich” versus much of the recent year.
MarketChameleon’s history also suggests the options market has overestimated HD’s earnings move frequently (a sign that “IV crush” risk is real if the move underdelivers).
Lowe’s (LOW): priced move ~±5%
LOW is at $280.36.
A ±5% earnings move implies:
5% of 280.36 = 0.05 × 280.36 = 14.02
Implied range:
Down: 280.36 − 14.02 = 266.34
Up: 280.36 + 14.02 = 294.38
That matches the market framing: down near $266 or up through ~$294.
Stock-Level Analysis: Home Depot (HD)
The fundamental “tell” this quarter
The market is less focused on whether HD hits the quarter and more focused on whether the company is tracking toward its fiscal 2026 setup.
HD has already provided preliminary fiscal 2026 parameters:
home improvement market: −1% to +1%
comps: flat to +2%
total sales: +2.5% to +4.5%
operating margin: ~12.4% to 12.6%
EPS: flat to +4%
So your earnings “decision tree” is anchored to:
whether management language reinforces those bands,
whether early-year demand looks better/worse than that baseline,
and whether margins are being protected without heavy promo behavior.
What the Street expects for the quarter
A widely-circulated preview expectation is around:
$2.53 EPS on $38.15B revenue (with revenue down YoY).
Active trader takeaway: HD has a defined forward narrative already. That tends to reduce “surprise risk” in the numbers and increase sensitivity to:
Pro demand cadence,
big-ticket category commentary,
and spring season setup.
Stock-Level Analysis: Lowe’s (LOW)
LOW’s “tell” is different: can it sustain momentum without DIY re-accelerating?
LOW has been working the same structural levers:
Pro penetration,
execution (stores/supply chain),
and shareholder returns.
This week, the market expects LOW to potentially swing wider than HD—about ±5%.
A common preview expectation is around:
~$1.9–$2.0 EPS on ~$20.3B revenue.
Active trader takeaway: LOW can win even in a soft DIY environment if it convinces the tape that:
Pro is offsetting,
pricing/margins are stable,
and guidance doesn’t “walk back” improvement narratives.
Technical Framework: Where Price Action Will Confirm or Reject the Story
This is a volatility event—so you want simple, repeatable technical reference points.
HD: key reference levels from the options-implied range
Pivot zone: the implied downside area near $367
Pivot zone: the implied upside area near $398
(these are not magic numbers; they’re where positioning pressure often shows up).
Moving average context can help frame post-earnings behavior:
Investing.com lists HD’s 50-day MA ~385.61 and 200-day MA ~381.22 (both very close to spot), which implies the stock is sitting near “decision” trend lines going into the print.
How to use that:
If HD gaps and holds above the 50-day zone, buyers are likely defending the trend.
If HD gaps down through these reference zones and cannot reclaim them, downside follow-through risk increases.
LOW: trend support is clear, but earnings can reset it
Investing.com lists LOW’s 50-day MA ~283.32 and 200-day MA ~276.12.
Given spot near $280, that’s a clean map:
the 50-day is slightly overhead,
the 200-day is slightly below.
How to use that:
A bullish reaction often looks like: reclaim/hold above the 50-day reference post-earnings.
A bearish reaction often looks like: lose the 200-day reference and fail to reclaim quickly.
Scenario Modeling: Base, Bull, Bear
Base Case: Results “in-line,” guidance holds, stocks stay inside implied range
Trigger: EPS/revenue roughly meet expectations and management language reinforces existing bands.
Likely market behavior:
The first move fades.
Volatility compresses (classic post-earnings IV crush dynamic).
Price tends to settle back toward pre-earnings equilibrium.
What to watch:
Whether HD holds the low end of the implied band (~367) if it sells off.
Whether LOW holds the mid-to-upper 270s if it sells off (near its 200-day reference).
Bull Case: “Spring demand improving” + Pro strength + stable margins
Trigger: Commentary indicates stabilization is real and improving—especially if Pro shows strength and big-ticket categories aren’t deteriorating.
Likely market behavior:
Breaks above the implied upside band can trend for 1–3 sessions as positioning adjusts.
The housing complex (XHB/ITB) benefits.
Tell: A bullish gap that holds (no immediate fade) is often the difference between “headline pop” and “trend shift.”
Bear Case: Demand defers again + guidance cautious + margin pressure reappears
Trigger: Management hints that softer turnover and cautious consumers are weighing on discretionary projects, or that price/mix is fading.
Likely market behavior:
Down gaps that fail to reclaim VWAP often lead to continuation selling.
Housing complex can de-rate (especially if rates tick higher or macro headlines worsen).
Macro amplifier: Even though mortgage rates improved to ~6.01%, housing activity remains weak—so cautious commentary can carry extra weight.
Active Trader Strategy Framework: How to Trade the Week Without Guessing
This is where disciplined traders separate from headline traders.
1) Decide what you are trading: Direction or Volatility
If you want direction, you need a thesis about what guidance and commentary will do to expectations.
If you want volatility, you need a thesis about whether the realized move will exceed what’s priced (±4% HD, ±5% LOW).
Historical note: HD’s options market has often priced more movement than realized (IV crush risk), which matters for how you structure exposure.
2) Use the implied range as your “battle map”
For HD at $382.25:
~$367 is where a full priced downside move lands
~$398 is where a full priced upside move lands
For LOW at $280.36:
~$266 downside
~$294 upside
Why it matters: markets frequently “pin” near implied bands or overshoot them briefly and mean-revert. Either way, those zones become high-information areas.
3) Confirmation rules: “Hold the gap” vs “fade the gap”
If the stock gaps and holds above VWAP through the first 60–90 minutes, the market is accepting the new price (higher probability of trend day).
If the stock gaps and fails VWAP repeatedly, the market is rejecting the move (higher probability of fade/mean reversion).
This is especially useful in retail earnings where liquidity is deep but positioning can be crowded.
4) Pair-trade logic: HD vs LOW (relative strength)
Because these prints are back-to-back:
HD reaction can set the tone for LOW.
Divergence is information.
Examples:
If HD sells off but LOW holds firm into its print, the market may be signaling LOW is the preferred operator.
If both rally on commentary that Pro demand is stronger, the “category is improving” narrative strengthens.
5) Know your macro tells for post-earnings follow-through
The housing tape is rate-sensitive.
If long-duration bonds are selling and yields are rising, housing-linked equities tend to lose momentum.
If rates remain contained (mortgage rates ~6.01% and stable), the market is more willing to reward incremental stabilization.
A practical proxy:
TLT: $89.41 (if TLT is falling hard, yields are rising, and the housing complex can struggle to hold gains).
Conclusion: This Week Is a Defined-Risk Event for the “Real Economy” Tape
HD and LOW earnings are not a single-company story this week. They’re a test of whether “real economy” leadership has legs in 2026—and whether improving mortgage rates can translate into a stronger spring project cycle.
The market has clearly framed the volatility:
HD: ±4%
LOW: ±5%
The macro backdrop is equally clear:
mortgage rates are lower (6.01%), but activity remains soft (existing-home sales 3.91M SAAR, down 8.4%).
So the trade is not “beats vs misses.”
The trade is: commentary + guidance credibility + price acceptance.
Preparation beats prediction:
Map the implied range.
Let VWAP and gap behavior confirm the scenario.
Size for a 4–5% event, not a normal day.
Editorial Disclaimer
This commentary is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All market strategies involve risk, and past performance is not indicative of future results. Readers should conduct their own analysis or consult a licensed financial professional before making investment decisions.