A message from our friends at The Oxford Club (sponsor)
Marc Lichtenfeld here.
I don't have to tell you...
We're in one of the most volatile markets we've seen in some time.
It's nerve-wracking for many investors.
That's why I'm giving you my top five high-dividend-yield stocks for a volatile market... completely free of charge.
Seriously, no credit card required.
You'll discover...
The safest 8% dividend yield in the market
My top three "Extreme Dividend" stocks, which could supercharge your income
And my No. 1 dividend stock for a lifetime of income
Click here to get the names and ticker symbols now... before the download link expires.
Sincerely,
Marc Lichtenfeld
Author of Get Rich with Dividends,
Chief Income Strategist of The Oxford Club
P.S. You'll also discover how to lock in a passive income stream where you get at least one check every single month with a small portfolio of dividend stocks. No matter how volatile the market is.
BONUS ARTICLE
The Market Is Pricing “War Insurance” — Lockheed (LMT) Is the Cleanest Gauge
Bullet Summary
“War insurance” rotation is real: Defense leaders rallied as the Middle East conflict escalated; LMT, RTX, and NOC hit/approached 52-week highs in the move.
Macro catalyst: Oil is repricing sharply; Brent reached a 19-month high ~$85 and traded ~$83 (+~7% on the day).
LMT fundamentals support the bid: 2025 sales $75.0B (+6% YoY), record backlog $194B, 2025 free cash flow $6.9B.
2026 outlook is explicitly stronger: LMT guided ~5% sales growth, ~25% segment operating profit growth, and $6.5–$6.8B free cash flow.
Capital return is still heavy: 2025 included $3.1B dividends and $3.0B share repurchases (6.6M shares).
Policy tailwind: FY2026 defense appropriations included $167.5B for procurement and $145.9B for R&D, plus targeted adds for air/missile defense.
Trade setup: LMT is the “tell.” If defense is truly being accumulated, LMT should hold VWAP on pullbacks and defend post-headline gap levels.
Macro Context: “War Insurance” Is a Pricing Regime, Not a Trade Idea
When geopolitical risk becomes persistent (not a one-headline spike), markets reprice three things at once:
Energy risk premium (direct inflation channel)
Defense replenishment cycles (munitions, air defense, aircraft readiness)
Duration risk (higher inflation expectations pressure long-duration growth equities)
This week’s tape is displaying exactly that pattern.
Reuters describes a widening conflict disrupting regional energy flows and shipping, with Brent spiking to ~$85 intraday and trading around ~$83 (+~7% on the day) amid fears of broader supply instability. That’s the macro fuel for rotation: if energy and freight costs rise, investors lean into sectors that are either insulated from demand destruction or directly benefit from government spending.
Defense fits that bill—particularly the primes with large backlogs, scalable production, and direct exposure to missiles and air-defense replenishment. (continued below…)
Nearly 19% of U.S. electricity already comes from nuclear power. Yet America imports 99% of the uranium required to run it. Now AI data centers are accelerating demand - and Washington is pouring billions into rebuilding domestic supply.
(…continued)
Sector Breakdown: Who Benefits From the “War Insurance” Bid—and Who Doesn’t
The defense complex is not trading as a single block. This tape is increasingly selective.
Beneficiaries
1) Prime contractors with backlog and production scalability
Lockheed (LMT), Northrop (NOC), RTX (RTX) have been the cleanest “risk premium” beneficiaries during the Iran-driven rotation.
The market is focusing on platforms and systems that are immediately relevant to air operations, strike capabilities, and air/missile defense.
2) Missile / air-defense exposed names
The market is implicitly underwriting multi-quarter replenishment. That’s where “war insurance” becomes durable: not the first-week headline, but the follow-on procurement orders and accelerated deliveries.
3) European defense
Barron’s noted European defense names also benefit from broader military build-ups as the conflict increases urgency around readiness and stockpiles.
Not automatically winning
1) Names that already ran too far / crowded trades
Barron’s also highlighted that not every defense name was green on the same day—some lagged or dipped—suggesting profit taking and factor crowding.
2) Defense-adjacent without direct replenishment linkage
If the market decides the conflict is likely to be short-lived, the “insurance premium” collapses fastest in the lower-quality, higher-beta names.
Stock-Level Analysis: Lockheed (LMT) as the “Insurance Underwriter”
If “war insurance” is a real market regime, LMT tends to be the cleanest indicator because:
It’s liquid enough for institutions to size quickly
It’s diversified across air, missiles, space, and mission systems
It has backlog and cash flow that can absorb volatility
The core numbers that matter right now
From Lockheed’s full-year 2025 results:
2025 sales: $75.0B (+6% YoY)
Record backlog: $194B
2025 cash from operations: $8.6B
2025 free cash flow: $6.9B (after a pension contribution that also fulfilled a 2026 obligation)
And for forward guidance (this is critical for the “regime” call):
2026 outlook: ~5% sales growth midpoint
~25% year-over-year reported segment operating profit growth
Free cash flow: $6.5–$6.8B
The takeaway: LMT isn’t only catching a headline bid; it is also presenting a cash-flow-backed forward contract that investors can underwrite when macro is unstable.
Capital return is part of the “insurance” appeal
In 2025, LMT reported:
$3.1B paid in dividends
$3.0B used to repurchase 6.6M shares
That matters in a risk regime because it gives investors a second reason to hold the name beyond “the conflict headline”: the company can keep returning cash even if the market chops.
Policy Layer: Why the Backlog Can Stay Sticky
A big reason “war insurance” trades can persist is that the spending is not purely discretionary once inventories are low.
The Senate Appropriations Committee’s FY2026 defense appropriations summary cited $167.5B for procurement and $145.9B for R&D, including adds for air/missile defense and F-35 sustainment-related line items.
For traders, you don’t need to forecast politics. You need to recognize that procurement and replenishment cycles often last longer than the news cycle that started them.
That’s how “insurance” becomes a trend instead of a spike.
Technical Framework: How to Trade “War Insurance” Without Chasing Headlines
Defense can gap hard on war headlines. The difference between a good trade and a bad one is usually execution discipline.
1) VWAP is the lie detector
Bullish tape: LMT sells off early, reclaims VWAP, and holds above it into the close.
Fading tape: LMT cannot reclaim VWAP after the first 60–90 minutes; rallies become liquidity.
2) Gap-day structure matters more than opinions
When the stock gaps on geopolitical catalysts:
First support becomes gap-day low
First resistance becomes the breakdown zone if the gap fades
If price holds above the gap-day midpoint and above VWAP, that’s often institutional “acceptance”
3) Relative strength confirmation
A clean “war insurance” regime typically shows:
LMT strong while broad index futures are weak (risk-off rotation)
Defense leaders up while cyclicals and high-duration growth underperform
Barron’s described that exact cross-current—defense up even as broader markets were under pressure on escalation risk.
Scenario Modeling: Base, Bull, Bear
Trigger: Conflict remains active, but markets oscillate between escalation and de-escalation headlines.
Sector impact: Defense leaders outperform in bursts; laggards chop.
LMT implication: Buyable pullbacks only if VWAP holds and higher lows form.
Bull Case: Replenishment cycle becomes the narrative
Trigger: Sustained operations lead to visible replenishment needs (munitions, air-defense interceptors, aircraft readiness).
Sector impact: Broadening from primes into selected suppliers and missile exposure.
LMT implication: Trend conditions improve; breakouts are more likely to hold if volume expands and pullbacks are shallow.
Bear Case: Fast de-escalation and premium unwind
Trigger: The market decides the conflict risk is transient; oil retraces sharply.
Sector impact: Defense “insurance” premium compresses; crowded winners get mean-reverted.
LMT implication: Watch for repeated VWAP rejection and failure to hold prior breakout levels—those are early tells that the premium is being sold.
Active Trader Strategy: If X Happens → Watch Y
If oil continues to make higher highs → watch whether LMT can hold above VWAP on intraday pullbacks; that’s the best “institutional demand” filter in a risk-premium tape.
If LMT gaps up on headlines → watch the gap-day midpoint; acceptance above midpoint is often the difference between trend and fade.
If broad markets sell off but LMT holds → watch for relative-strength continuation (leaders usually lead again).
If LMT loses VWAP and fails reclaim → treat “war insurance” as a short-lived spike and tighten time horizon.
Watch whether LMT can hold VWAP on pullbacks and defend gap-day lows. If those confirmations persist, traders may treat weakness as structured support tests rather than headline noise. Preparation beats prediction.
Editorial Disclaimer
This commentary is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All market strategies involve risk, and past performance is not indicative of future results. Readers should conduct their own analysis or consult a licensed financial professional before making investment decisions.