_{Frist a message from our friends at The Oxford Club (sponsor)}

Trump's energy policies could send this account into overdrive

For 137 years now…

A little-known public land trust has been quietly sitting on millions of acres of American land...

Paying royalties on every drop of energy that gets pulled out of the ground.

Oil. Natural gas. Even water.

Every barrel. Every cubic foot. Every gallon.

The checks just keep rolling in.

It’s so profitable… a single $1,000 investment since January 2000 turned into $556,000!

That works out to a 29% return… every year for 25-straight years.

You can check out the details by clicking here.

But get this…

Donald Trump just TURBOCHARGED the entire opportunity…

He just pledged $500 billion to develop massive new AI data centers – and he’s beginning with this specific area.

More drilling means more royalties.

More royalties mean bigger payouts.

Bigger payouts mean even better returns for anyone holding what I call "The 29% Account."

The big banks figured this out decades ago.

BlackRock, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan – they've all quietly parked billions here.

Now you can do the same.

Click here to start tapping this cash gushing machine before drilling starts.

Good investing,

Marc Lichtenfeld
Chief Income Strategist, The Oxford Club

P.S. This account is open to any American – no matter your age or income. Click here to see how it works.

The first mistake traders make in a tape like this is treating the move in crude as just another commodity breakout.

It is not.

This is a macro shock that is now feeding directly into equities, currencies, rates, and inflation expectations. Reuters reported Monday’s crude move was one of the sharpest in years, with Brent spiking to $119.50 and WTI also briefly nearing $120 as the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran intensified and producers across the Gulf curtailed output. Reuters also noted that after those spikes, prices eased somewhat when G7 governments and Saudi Arabia discussed possible emergency measures and extra supply, but the market still remained deep in crisis mode.

That is the key. Even the partial retracement is happening from crisis levels.

The market is not pricing a routine geopolitical premium. It is pricing the possibility that a key artery of the global energy system is no longer functioning normally. Reuters described the Strait of Hormuz as the transit point for around 20% of global oil supply, while other Reuters energy coverage said the conflict has already disrupted exports and forced production stoppages from Qatar to Iraq.

This is what turns an energy rally into a war-flation event.

If crude holds above $100 for any sustained period, the transmission channels are obvious:

Reuters’ Monday futures coverage captured that cross-asset stress clearly: U.S. stock-index futures fell over 1% as investors worried about stagflation and global recession risks, while volatility jumped and the market re-rated travel and financials lower.

So before we even talk stocks, the regime is clear:

This is not “oil is up, buy energy.”
This is “oil is up, and the whole market now has to reprice growth, inflation, and policy.”

The user’s framing is directionally right, but the market moved even harder than the early-morning snapshot.

Reuters attributed the latest leg higher to three overlapping drivers.

First, the war itself intensified over the weekend, including new attacks on Iranian energy infrastructure and the hardline succession dynamic in Tehran. Reuters reported Mojtaba Khamenei, son of the late Ali Khamenei, was named Iran’s new Supreme Leader, reinforcing expectations of a more confrontational line rather than a de-escalatory one.

Second, supply interruptions are no longer theoretical. Reuters said Iraq, Kuwait, and the UAE were cutting output, while Saudi Arabia was using rare tenders and alternative routes to keep flows moving. At the same time, tankers and exporters have been dealing with Hormuz-related disruption, which is why near-term Brent backwardation has blown out to extreme levels.

Third, governments are still reacting rather than leading. Reuters reported the U.S. was not initially discussing an SPR release after the first Iran strikes, though by Monday G7 governments were discussing emergency reserve options as prices surged. That kind of hesitation matters because it tells the market policymakers are behind the price action, not ahead of it.

This is why “war-flation” is the right phrase.

The inflation impulse is not coming from domestic overheating. It is coming from a geopolitical supply shock colliding with uncertain policy response.

When oil shocks hit, the sector map changes quickly.

The obvious winners are upstream and integrated energy names. Rising crude prices lift realized pricing, widen cash-flow expectations, and force portfolio managers to rotate into the only sector directly benefiting from the problem. Reuters and Barron’s both showed that pattern Monday, with APA, Chevron, Exxon, and other energy names trading higher while the broader market slumped.

Defense stocks also tend to catch flows, but that is a different trade. They are “conflict premium” stocks. Oil producers are “cash flow now” stocks. In a sustained war-flation tape, energy usually leads defense on immediate earnings sensitivity.

Travel is the cleanest casualty. Reuters said airlines were among the hardest-hit groups in the futures-led selloff because higher fuel costs feed straight into margins. Financials and cyclicals also came under pressure because an oil shock tends to tighten financial conditions without improving broader demand.

Long-duration tech gets squeezed too. Not because oil changes chip demand directly, but because it changes the discount-rate framework. If energy pushes inflation expectations higher, the market becomes less willing to pay extreme multiples for future cash flows.

So the sector logic is simple:

That is the classic war-flation map.

The prompt names APA, EOG, Chevron, and Exxon, and that is the right watchlist. But they do not all do the same job in a portfolio.

APA is the smallest and most torque-heavy of the four. Current tape has APA at $32.68, with a market cap of about $8.59B and a P/E of roughly 6.1x.

That low multiple tells you the market is not assigning premium status here. It is assigning cyclicality and skepticism.

But APA’s latest financials show why it can move sharply in a high-oil environment. In Q4 2025, APA reported $1.2B in adjusted EBITDAX, $425M in free cash flow, and returned $154M to shareholders.

APA is the type of name that can outperform early in an oil shock because it has more direct sensitivity and a lower expectations bar. The downside is that smaller E&Ps often lose sponsorship quickly if oil cools or recession risk becomes the dominant narrative.

EOG trades at $131.41, with a market cap of $60.63B and a P/E near 11.0x.

This is a different kind of upstream story than APA. EOG is larger, cleaner operationally, and usually gets more credit for discipline. Its latest results showed $4.7B in free cash flow for 2025, with the company returning 100% of that to shareholders through dividends and buybacks.

Reuters also noted EOG beat Q4 expectations on higher production. That matters because in a war-flation tape, domestic producers with strong balance sheets and visible production tend to get treated as “safer torque.”

If you want upstream exposure without going all the way down the risk curve, EOG is the most balanced expression of that trade in this four-stock basket.

Chevron trades at $189.94, with a market cap of $268.34B and a P/E around 21.0x.

The multiple is richer than APA or EOG because Chevron is not being bought as a pure commodity torque vehicle. It is being bought as a large-cap quality oil franchise.

Chevron’s Q4 2025 results showed:

This is why Chevron often works well in a war-flation tape. It has enough size and liquidity for institutions to hide in, but enough upstream leverage to benefit from higher crude.

Exxon trades at $151.21, with a market cap of $480.68B and a P/E around 16.0x.

Exxon is the closest thing this market has to a macro oil benchmark in equity form.

Its latest results were strong:

Exxon’s advantage in this setup is not just earnings sensitivity. It is balance-sheet confidence plus scale plus liquidity. If portfolio managers decide they need energy exposure fast, Exxon is usually one of the first stops.

The bullish side of this trade is easy.

At $105–$120 oil, producers make a lot more money. Estimates go up. Cash-flow models improve. The tape rotates accordingly.

But this setup has an obvious threshold problem.

If the market starts believing the $150 scenario is plausible, the trade changes. Reuters and other widely cited reports Monday highlighted warnings that oil could move dramatically higher if Gulf exports remain impaired and Hormuz stays constrained.

At that point, the logic becomes:

Energy stocks can still outperform relative to the market in that environment, but absolute upside becomes less clean because the macro damage starts to overwhelm the micro benefit.

That is the key distinction active traders need to respect.

This is an oil-windfall trade until it becomes an oil-destruction trade.

This is not the kind of setup where static valuation alone will save you.

You need a process.

The first signal is crude itself. If oil keeps making higher highs but the energy stocks cannot hold their intraday gains, that is an early warning that the market is shifting from earnings enthusiasm to recession fear.

In war-flation tapes, opening moves are emotional. The best confirmation usually comes after the first 30–60 minutes:

The best reads are not just “stock is up.”
The best reads are:

That matters because a trader should not expect the same intraday behavior from all four.

Trigger: Hormuz risk remains elevated, supply stays constrained, and governments talk more than they act.
Sector impact: Energy remains leadership, airlines/cyclicals stay under pressure, tech struggles with the inflation overlay.
Stock implications: EOG and APA likely show the strongest commodity torque; Exxon and Chevron remain the preferred lower-volatility large-cap expressions.

Trigger: Output cuts persist, reserve relief is limited, and crude remains in the $110–$120+ zone.
Sector impact: Energy broadens, more E&Ps catch bids, defense stays firm, travel weakens further.
Stock implications: APA and EOG could outperform on torque; Exxon and Chevron continue grinding higher as institutions add size.

Trigger: The market begins to treat the shock as growth-destructive rather than merely inflationary.
Sector impact: Broad de-risking intensifies, even energy starts to fade on strength, and recession trades dominate.
Stock implications: Energy may still outperform relatively, but absolute returns get choppier; smaller names like APA become more fragile, while XOM/CVX likely hold up better than the group.

If crude stabilizes above $100 but stops making vertical new highs, watch whether XOM and CVX can continue holding VWAP and prior opening-range support. That would suggest the market still sees this as an earnings-windfall trade rather than a panic trade.

If oil resumes pushing higher and EOG and APA begin outperforming the integrated majors, that would suggest traders are moving from safety-first energy exposure to higher-torque upstream exposure.

If crude remains elevated but the energy names start fading anyway, watch the broader market’s recession pricing. That would be the signal that “war-flation” is crossing into “demand destruction,” and the best risk-reward in the sector may already be behind the first move.

Preparation beats prediction.

Monday’s move is not just an oil story. It is a market-regime story.

Oil blew through $100 and briefly toward $120 because the market is pricing real wartime supply risk, not just headline noise. Reuters’ reporting on production cuts, Hormuz disruption, and emergency reserve discussions makes that clear.

That creates obvious winners:

But it also creates a much bigger macro question.

At what point does higher oil stop being a gift to producers and start becoming a tax on the global economy?

That is the threshold that matters now.

For the moment, energy is still the first and cleanest beneficiary of the war-flation trade. But active traders should stay focused on confirmation, not narrative. Watch crude. Watch VWAP. Watch relative strength. And watch for the moment when the tape stops rewarding the winners of the oil spike and starts fearing what the oil spike means for everything else.

_{Editorial Disclaimer}

_{This commentary is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All market strategies involve risk, and past performance is not indicative of future results. Readers should conduct their own analysis or consult a licensed financial professional before making investment decisions.}