_{A message from our friends at Behind the Markets (sponsor)}

The biggest scam in the history of gold markets is unwinding

Dear Fellow Investor,

Let me give you a number.

90 to 1.

That's how many paper gold claims exist for every real ounce in COMEX vaults.

Ninety promises. One ounce of metal.

It's like a game of musical chairs. Except there are 90 players. And only 1 chair.

When the music stops, 89 people lose.

And the music IS stopping.

COMEX gold inventory dropped 25% last year alone. The gold is flowing East. Shanghai. Mumbai. Moscow.

On March 31st, contract holders can demand delivery. If too many show up at once...

You've seen what happens. They change the rules. They close markets. They ban buying.

Every time, paper holders got crushed. Mining stock holders made fortunes.

I've found the one stock at the center of this crisis.

Get the name and ticker here >>>

"The Buck Stops Here,"

Dylan Jovine, CEO & Founder
Behind the Markets

Oil tanker stocks are one of the market’s favorite ways to make disciplined investors feel reckless.

They almost always screen cheap.
They almost always arrive with a good macro story.
And they almost always remind you, eventually, that shipping is still a cyclical, capital-intensive, deeply emotional business.

That is exactly why they belong on a bargain hunter’s watchlist.

Because when tanker equities get “under pressure,” the market usually means one of two things:

Right now, that second category matters most.

Reuters reported the Iran conflict has severely disrupted shipping through the Gulf and Strait of Hormuz, with tankers stranded, ships damaged, insurers pulling war-risk coverage, and premiums jumping from roughly 0.2% to 1% of vessel value in just two days. Reuters also said freight rates out of the Middle East to Asia were already sitting at six-year highs before the latest escalation.

That should sound like a gift to tanker owners.

And yet tanker equities are still treated like fragile cyclicals that can collapse the minute freight markets normalize.

That tension is where the cheap list lives.

If you want the most relevant trio in this setup, I would focus on:

That price spread already tells you something.

DHT and Ardmore sit in the obvious “cheap-looking” zone by share price. Scorpio does not. But a Cheap Investor framework does not care about the sticker price of one share. It cares about the relationship between:

That is the correct lens.

Shipping stocks are almost never valued on current profits alone.

They are valued on what investors think those profits look like a year from now, or one freight cycle from now.

That is why tanker names can print strong quarters and still trade like the market does not believe them.

The fear list is always the same:

That distrust is not irrational.

It is the business model.

Reuters’ latest Gulf-shipping coverage actually reinforces both sides of the argument at once. On one hand, the disruption is very real: damaged vessels, insurers pulling back, huge premium jumps, and even higher recent war-risk pricing, with Reuters later reporting premiums had surged far beyond the initial move, in some cases toward 3% of vessel value. On the other hand, that also tells you how unstable and headline-driven the market has become.

So yes, the freight backdrop is supportive.

But the market still does not trust the duration of the earnings.

That is why these stocks still look interesting.

If you care most about fleet quality, operating leverage, and management discipline, Scorpio is the best business of the three.

Scorpio is one of the largest product-tanker operators in the world, and its latest earnings materials show a fleet of 91 eco vessels with a relatively young fleet profile. Its focus is product tankers, which means it moves refined fuels such as gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel rather than crude itself. That matters because refined-product dislocations can last longer when trade routes are reshuffled and refinery patterns change.

The company’s latest update was strong.

Scorpio raised its quarterly dividend to $0.45 per share, and the company highlighted one of the most important numbers in the entire sector: a $10,000/day increase in average daily freight rates would generate roughly $332 million to $340 million of incremental annualized cash flow. It also continued pruning older tonnage and adding modern MR newbuilds.

That is what quality looks like in shipping:

So why is Scorpio still not an easy buy?

Because the market already knows it is the better operator.

In other words, Scorpio is not “cheap” in the sleepy deep-value sense. It is only cheap if you believe:

Scorpio is the best business on the list. It is the tanker stock for investors who want quality first and cyclicality second. But it is also the one where the market is already giving some credit for that quality.

If you want the most straightforward value argument in the group, DHT is probably it.

DHT is a pure-play VLCC operator. That means it owns very large crude carriers—the giant ships that move crude on long-haul routes. There is no complicated conglomerate discount here. It is a relatively clean exposure to crude tanker economics.

And the numbers are exactly what a value-minded shipping investor wants to see.

For Q4 2025, DHT estimated:

Third-party earnings coverage and the company’s Q4 release also pointed to:

But the most important number is not the quarter.

It is the cushion.

Management discussed a 2026 spot cash breakeven near $17,500/day. That is the kind of number tanker investors should always memorize, because it tells you how much room exists between today’s market rates and tomorrow’s financial pain.

That spread is why DHT stands out. If your fleet is earning something in the neighborhood of $60,300/day and your spot cash breakeven is around $17,500/day, the business is not merely surviving. It is minting a wide margin between market reality and break-even stress.

So why is DHT still under pressure?

Because tanker investors always ask the same forward question: what happens when rates normalize? And DHT’s own prior market materials pointed to a VLCC orderbook that is meaningful enough to keep supply risk in the conversation. That is part of why the stock still trades with skepticism instead of with a premium.

At $18.07, DHT is the cleanest “cheap on current math” tanker name. You are paying a modest stock price for:

If I wanted the cleanest value-first setup in the group, DHT would be it.

Ardmore is the most interesting smaller-cap swing in the group.

It operates product and chemical tankers, with meaningful exposure to the medium-range niche. That gives it exposure to many of the same refined-product dislocations as Scorpio, but with a smaller market profile and a more volatile earnings response.

The latest reported numbers were respectable:

Ardmore also used its earnings materials to emphasize operational momentum, more revenue days, and completed upgrades that could support 2026 earnings power. Third-party commentary highlighted that the company entered the year with stronger momentum and a more upgraded fleet base.

Why does Ardmore stay cheap?

Because smaller tanker names rarely get the benefit of the doubt. The market treats them as:

That means even solid execution does not buy them much valuation forgiveness.

But that is also the source of upside torque.

At $15.95, Ardmore offers:

The downside is obvious too: when rates wobble, smaller names usually get hit first and hardest.

Ardmore is the aggressive bargain hunter’s tanker name. Less safe than DHT, less polished than Scorpio, but arguably the most interesting torque sleeve if the refined-products market stays stronger than the market expects.

Here is the clean ranking.

Scorpio Tankers

You are paying for:

DHT Holdings

You are paying a modest stock price for:

Ardmore Shipping

You are paying for:

Hormuz disruption persists, war-risk insurance stays elevated, and trade routes remain longer, slower, and more expensive. In that world, tanker rates stay high enough for all three names to keep printing cash. Reuters’ reporting on stranded vessels, damaged tankers, withdrawn insurance coverage, and surging premiums supports the idea that the dislocation is already very real.

The panic cools, but freight markets remain healthy enough for good operators to stay profitable. In that environment, DHT and Scorpio likely hold up best, while Ardmore remains the more volatile version of the same theme.

The geopolitical premium fades quickly, supply becomes the story again, and the market decides current earnings were peak-cycle. That is how tanker stocks go from “cheap” to “why did I own this?” in a hurry.

This is not a “back up the truck” sector.

It is a scale-in sector.

My framework would look like this:

And the standard shipping rule still applies:

One-third, one-third, one-third.
Never full-size headline-driven shipping names on day one.

Because if the freight spike fades, the market will punish comfort faster than it rewards optimism.

Track these questions:

If you want the clean answer:

If shipping disruption stays real, all three can work.

If the freight spike fades quickly, the one I would trust most from a pure bargain-hunter perspective is still DHT, because the current stock price still looks conservative relative to the recent earnings power and the break-even math.

That is the key distinction.

Scorpio is the stock I respect most.
DHT is the one that looks cheapest.
Ardmore is the one that can surprise the most.

And in shipping, those are not always the same thing.

_{Editorial Disclaimer}

_{This commentary is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All market strategies involve risk, and past performance is not indicative of future results. Readers should conduct their own analysis or consult a licensed financial professional before making investment decisions.}