A message from our friends at The Oxford Club (sponsor)
Dear Reader,
After calling RYCEY at $2 in 2022 (now $16), I found something better. This tiny chip firm just partnered with a tech giant for its breakthrough technology.
40% less energy
Performs up to 100x faster
set 2 world records.
My happiest followers reported they made up to $8.2M on RYCEY. Now, I found a $2B company with patents the biggest AI firms desperately need. This new chip tech just set 2 world records. Major players are partnering up fast. This could repeat the greatest tech runs in history.
Silicon Valley's elite are flocking to this unknown firm for one reason: It holds the patents on chip tech that uses 40% less power while performing up to 100x faster. This tiny company just landed a massive partnership. Insiders call it the greatest breakthrough in decades.
And it just partnered with Nvidia. Details here.
This $2B company holds patents Nvidia needs for its new AI super-factories. This chip breakthrough set 2 world records. One analyst calls it "the greatest I've seen.” Details here.
Yours in smart speculation,
Karim Rahemtulla, Head Fundamental Tactician
Monument Traders Alliance
BONUS ARTICLE
Tariff for Taxes?
Bullet Summary
In the SOTU, Trump said tariffs could “substantially replace” the modern income-tax system.
U.S. futures were muted after the address, reflecting a “wait for details” posture.
China warned it will respond if new U.S. trade probes lead to additional tariffs.
The EU trade chief described a “transition” period as the bloc seeks clarity on the U.S. tariff path and potential overrides of prior understandings.
Independent analysis argues tariffs are unlikely to replace income taxes at the scale implied, framing the policy as a macro uncertainty shock more than a clean fiscal swap.
Why This Matters for Active Traders
The market isn’t trading “tariffs” as a moral or political issue.
It’s trading second-order mechanics:
Revenue arithmetic (how much money tariffs can plausibly raise vs. income tax)
Retaliation probability (China/EU response function)
Implementation pathway (scope, exemptions, stacking, enforcement)
Corporate transmission (who eats costs vs. passes through)
That’s why SOTU-driven volatility often shows up as sector dispersion rather than a straight-line move in SPY.
SPY closed near $687.35 on the latest tape snapshot—down about 1.0% on the day—while factor and sector internals continued to separate.(continued below)
Four 100%-owned projects in N. America's safest mining zones. Learn why this could be a key moment in the metals race >
(continued…)
1) The Claim: “Tariffs Replace Income Tax” — The Market’s Translation
In the address and transcript coverage, Trump argued that tariffs (paid by foreign countries) could “substantially replace” income taxes.
Whether that’s viable at scale is a fiscal math question, but for traders the key is simpler:
If the market believes this becomes a durable policy direction, then tariffs stop being a one-off headline and become a structural input into:
inflation expectations (via import prices),
margin expectations (via landed costs),
and global growth expectations (via trade friction).
Independent commentary and data-driven critiques (including Nasdaq.com’s analysis) argue tariffs are unlikely to replace income taxes in a meaningful way and often behave like a broad-based consumption tax with growth and market implications.
Trader takeaway: regardless of feasibility, the narrative increases the probability of a longer-lived tariff regime—and markets price probability distributions, not policy whitepapers.
2) Immediate Tape Read: Why Futures Stayed Cautious
AP reported U.S. futures were essentially flat after the SOTU, consistent with “headline absorbed, details pending.”
Yahoo’s live market coverage similarly framed futures action as steady-to-cautious around the address and the next catalysts.
This is typical when:
the speech adds directional intent but not implementation specificity, and
markets are already carrying elevated macro uncertainty from trade policy.
The key for tomorrow isn’t whether futures were flat.
It’s whether leadership broadens (risk-on confirmation) or narrows (defensive rotation / hedging demand).
3) Retaliation Risk: China and the EU Are Signaling Their Reaction Functions
China: “We will respond” is the volatility input
Reuters reported China said it has met obligations under prior agreements and warned against more tariffs tied to ongoing U.S. Section 301 investigations—stating it would defend its rights if additional trade restrictions follow.
Market translation: China is communicating that retaliation is not theoretical. This increases uncertainty premia for:
multinationals with China-linked supply chains,
exporters with China revenue exposure,
and global cyclicals sensitive to trade volumes.
EU: “Transition period” language = negotiations + uncertainty window
Reuters reported the EU trade chief described a transition period with the U.S., with daily discussions and concern that new tariffs could override prior deal exemptions.
The Financial Times also reported product-specific exemptions being affected (e.g., Belgian diamonds), highlighting how rule changes can reprice specific industry chains quickly.
Market translation: EU rhetoric suggests retaliatory tools remain on the table even if negotiations continue—keeping European exposure and transatlantic supply chains in play.
4) How This Hits the Market: The Sector Transmission Map
Think of tariffs-as-tax-policy as a dispersion engine. The winners and losers are determined less by “tariffs” and more by three traits:
Import intensity (COGS sensitivity)
Pricing power (ability to pass through)
Supply-chain flexibility (ability to re-source)
A) Pricing power defensives: relative winners in uncertainty regimes
Consumer staples leadership is a classic tell when macro policy uncertainty rises.
XLP is around $89.74, up ~1.24% on the tape snapshot.
This aligns with “steady cash flow + pricing ability” being preferred when policy outcomes are unclear.
B) Discretionary and import-heavy brands: sensitivity to cost pass-through
XLY is around $116.74, down ~2.1%.
Nike (NKE) is $64.09, down ~3.5%.
Why these matter: discretionary demand is elastic, and import-heavy categories often face the toughest pass-through math.
C) Transports: friction proxy for trade volumes and routing
IYT is $80.78, down ~2.9%.
Transports often sniff out volume uncertainty early because supply-chain friction changes shipping cadence, inventory behavior, and route economics.
D) Industrials and “real economy” cyclicals: mixed bag
XLI is $176.98, down ~1.35%.
Caterpillar (CAT) $768.23 (slightly down).
Deere (DE) $644.54 (down more).
Industrials aren’t uniform:
Some benefit from localization/capex and domestic buildout.
Others face input cost inflation and demand sensitivity tied to global trade.
E) “Protection” hedges: domestic metals/mining can act as policy hedges
XME is $119.37 (slightly up).
Nucor (NUE) $175.15 (slightly down on the day).
These often behave like tail hedges if escalation becomes more credible.
5) Technical Framework: How to Trade a Speech-Driven Macro Tape
You don’t win these regimes by predicting policy. You win by trading accept/reject behavior.
The three highest-signal tools
1) VWAP acceptance the next day
Hold above VWAP after the first hour: institutions accept the move.
Repeated VWAP failures: distribution / fade risk rises.
2) Relative strength spreads (your “truth serum”)
Watch these pairs:
XLP vs XLY (defensive vs discretionary)
IYT vs SPY (trade friction vs broad beta)
FXI vs EFA (China beta vs developed ex-US)
3) Gap behavior
Gap-and-hold = narrative accepted
Gap-and-fade = narrative rejected / “details disappointment”
6) Scenario Modeling: Base, Bull, Bear
Base Case: High uncertainty, choppy index, rising dispersion
Trigger: rhetoric stays firm, details remain fluid, retaliation risk remains non-zero.
Expected tape: SPY chops; staples hold up better; transports/discretionary lag.
Bull Case: De-escalation signals and narrower implementation
Trigger: partners signal negotiation paths; policy implementation narrows the effective shock.
Expected tape: cyclicals and discretionary stabilize; transports stop underperforming.
Bear Case: Retaliation becomes explicit and near-dated
Trigger: China/EU follow through with credible countermeasures or trade restrictions.
Expected tape: risk-off broadens; defensives lead; emerging markets/China exposure underperforms.
7) Active Trader Strategy: Defined-Risk Playbook
If the market trades this as “more uncertainty”
Focus: defensives + quality pricing power
Watch: XLP strength vs XLY weakness
Invalidation: if XLY reclaims relative strength and holds VWAP, the market is de-risking the uncertainty premium.
If retaliation headlines heat up
Focus: reduce exposure to the highest trade-friction betas
Watch: IYT relative weakness vs SPY
Invalidation: IYT regains VWAP + holds into close.
If this becomes a “domestic buildout” narrative
Focus: selective industrials/materials as localization beneficiaries
Watch: XLI stabilization + XME leadership
Invalidation: XLI fails VWAP repeatedly with weak breadth.
Conclusion
“Tariff for Taxes?” isn’t just a headline. It’s a volatility catalyst because it reframes tariffs from a tactical lever into a potentially structural revenue concept—at the same time China and the EU are signaling retaliation risk.
For active traders, the edge is not in debating feasibility. It’s in trading the regime:
dispersion over direction
relative strength over narratives
VWAP acceptance over first reactions
Preparation beats prediction.
Editorial Disclaimer
This commentary is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All market strategies involve risk, and past performance is not indicative of future results. Readers should conduct their own analysis or consult a licensed financial professional before making investment decisions.